-
Posts
1,689 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Gallery
Everything posted by 13511
-
Well, considering that he appointed the person IN CHARGE of the IRS, would you expect that person NOT TO? You see, Rettig was appointed by your hero, the Zero Trumpty Dumpty. Sorry facts tend to interfere with your continued salacious fantasies of Trumpty Dumpty. Just one more case in which you talk shit that you know nothing about but your ilk (that ilk being the ones that run around developing a boner any time Trumpty Dumpty's name is mentioned) want to claim that under the same circumstances under Obama it was "all Obama" with those groups. Goose, meet Gander. As I've said many a time.. the BEST thing Trumpty Dumpty could do for this country is have a massive coronary while sitting on the toilet eating a Big Mac and sipping on a diet Coke and trying to pass the massive turd (which resembles him) that is from his previous junk food escapades.
-
The Paul "I'm gonna take ya' guns you filthy monkeys" Thread
13511 replied to 13511's topic in Master Debaters
You apparently don't keep up with the REAL news.. only the Trumpian news. You see, Trump (related even by some of his close confidants) is having a shit fit because he can't spew his shit so the mass public can see in defense of himself and it's becoming more and more apparent what a piece of extremely stinky, runny offal he was, and how stupid those that worshipped him are. You see, more and more information is coming out that those "truths" that he told his faithful are actuall "turds", and those that worship him are finally recognizing themselves as dumbasses. And there's more than "typing and making it so"... which is readily apparent by all the REPUBLICANS that have testified, and the numerous previous Trump sycophants that are having their eyes opened to sworn testimony. Then you have those that would continue licking Trumpty Dumpty's salty balls and believing they were consuming the finest sugar treats simply because he told them so. Which group are you in Sheldon? So, you deny you have any moderator/admin privs here? Care to have the site owner screenshot your user profile settings from the ACP? -
Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. Both Comey and McCabe come up for IRS audits during the Trump administration... and during the time that they had "feuds" with Trumpty Dumpty. what are the odds of that?
-
The Paul "I'm gonna take ya' guns you filthy monkeys" Thread
13511 replied to 13511's topic in Master Debaters
As is Trumpty Dumpty... so much so that he's having to debate announcing his 2024 run and losing the ability to grab monies from the rubes that he can line his pockets with, or continue to get bitch slapped around by that committee he now wishes he'd pushed his pube polishers (also known as sycophants) to partake in or announce his presidential ambitions. I'm leaning toward the moolah winning out with him. Care to wager? Please feel free to reply in the appropriate thread... I'm sure you have "moderator " privilege that allows you to move them. -
No, and if you had of WATCHED the testimony, you would know that she stated that was WHAT SHE WAS TOLD. And that by someone who has become an acknowledged hack of the Trump sycophants (and by others in the field acknowledged that he has an allegiance that is not "normal amongst their field), that was moved from a position as an employee of the Secret Service to someone who worked as an appointee of the Trumpty Dumpty Administration. Me, I'll continue to believe folks that have no allegiance to Trumpty Dumpty AND are willing to testify under oath. Meanwhile, the easily fooled inbreds will continue to toe he Trumpty Dumpty party line from those that don't have the balls to do so since they know that doing such could result in them with a stint in an iron bar hotel. You already MADE an excuse for him.. using the same "point" that the Trumpty Dumpty's use. Hutchison clearly stated that was what she was TOLD by that person... not what she observed... and ironically many that have been in the position of "the know" have acknowledged that her recitations bear more weight than the arguments by those that are to coward to testify under oath do (several because they observed the same behavioral patterns that keep repeating). Many of her other statements have already been supported by others as to their factuality (and many of those under oath). Please feel free to elucidate on why those who's position supports the Trumpty Dumpty party line fall back on the Fifth Amendment when they are under oath? And I simply asked you to expound on those that support the Trumpty Dumpty line of "facts" that have been willing to testify under oath without taking the 5th Amendment... that's a VERy easy question to answer. I didn't ask you to justify why they chose to take the 5th Amendment... as most of us that use cognitive thought processes can come to a realistic answer.
-
Doesn't require any "searching". In fact, all it requires is "ignoring" by the Trump worshippers. You see, it's those very same "worshippers" that thought if they would ignore the proposed bi-partisan Senate proposal that the circumstances would go away. It's only gone away for those that choose to ignore facts. Funny how many of his acolytes have come out now against him... many of them still saying he did good things... but also acknowledging the bullshit he's tried to pull (some going so far to say as criminal in nature)... You see, it's the simple minded Trump worshippers that try to make excuses for him.... do you count yourself amongst that number Sheldon? Because many that were in his "sycophantic echelon" have been changing their tune with the presentation of sworn testimony under oath while many of those Trump sycophants continue to claim protection under the 5th Amdendment. Of course, the standard Trumpty Dumpty cry of RINO is fully expected by those that have no ability to conduct cognitive thinking processes. Give them their "meth" of Trumpism statements and they are happy to rabidly consume, totally ignoring when they are slapped in the face with factual testimony under oath when those that argue against those that have don't have the balls to GIVE said testimony under oath, being the cowards that they are - which has become the "banner" of the current majority of Republicans that try to defend the chickenshit known as Trump. They feel MORE than free to espouse their shit in a public setting, but are scared shitless to say such under oath, knowing that they can be held responsible for their lies. Remind us Sheldon... how many Pro-Trump supporters have given their version under oath to the committee? Then how many of those have pled the 5th Amendment? Generally one does not proclaim protections under the 5th Amendment unless one believes that ones actions may rise to the level of culpability. I fully expect DeSantis to run against Trump, and also fully expect DeSantis to beat Trump to the curb like the little whiny bitch he (Trump) is. Now, I'm not going to say that's going to be a good thing for the Republican party, as it really needs to work back to the center if it ever hopes to have a chance. If they can't come to their senses, I'll have to (again) vote as an Independent for third party if they are more aligning to my beliefs. If not, I'll vote for whichever candidate is.. just like a noticeable segment of the Republican (and Democratic) party.
-
[ATTACH=full]2745._xfImport[/ATTACH]
-
[ATTACH=full]2744._xfImport[/ATTACH]
-
My official coffee cup that I expect to be delivered shortly. BTW, one of the clinicians that I do computer work for (I've done IT for her for 15 years), after being shown this site, agreed with the position of this coffee cup as perfectly fitting how well y'all fell to being manipulated. Paul, she did comment that you were especially easily triggered. [ATTACH=full]2743._xfImport[/ATTACH]
-
Let's see if imgflip can be "linked" here using an mp4 <link inserted but shown to be invalid> And for Paul's edification, the answer is no, so the link was not attached in the initial message since he apparently has issues knowing the limitations of this install of XenForo. For others that may want to see the mp4... https://i.imgflip.com/5tkdmt.mp4
-
Wow, even Mick Mulvaney (Trumpty Dumpty's former chief of staff, and a special envoy for Trump to Northern Ireland) says that he would NOT vote for Trump in a primary if he was on the ticket. He further commented that many of the Republicans in Washington see Trumpty Dumpty as "damaged" and they fear that he will weigh down the Republican Party. Mulvaney also isn't a fan of the 01/06 committee... but he acknowledges that the testimony by REPUBLICANS has been very telling and encourages other Republicans to listen to him. He also said that from indicators that he picked up on, the West Wing was being ran like a clown show. Surprise! Of course, as far back as last year Mulvaney commented that many of Trump's claims about 01/06 were patently false.... so tick one more into the RINO list. Isn't it rather ironic...the majority that support Trumpty Dumpty repeat the same works... "I take the fifth" or something similar.... could that have anything to do with their requests for open ended pardons from Trump? Meanwhile... the Georgia investigations of Trumpty Dumpty are heating up....
-
Not my problem that this version of XenForo didn't like to pull from meme generator. I've found that with the XenForo proxy (if being used) sometimes being an issue with certain sites and you have to then either download the image and attach directly or put it out on someplace like Imgur. So, now that you have received some edification we can continue talking about Trumpty Dumpty. But, to satisfy your curiosity, here is what this install of XenForo could not link to as a linked image. [ATTACH=full]2742._xfImport[/ATTACH]
-
Back to the topic at hand... now you could always start you a thread of "Paul the Truck Driver", seeing as you trend to take a topic off topic.
-
Well well, Hutchison's testimony was really eye opening to those that haven't sold their soul to the anti-christ Trumpty Dumpty. When you consider her age, the fact that she WAS in a position to be exposed to that AND that she was willing to testify under oath (unlike those that are trying to "Trump-splain" her statements away). Then those on the committee have now announced that even MORE people have come forward after her testimony, and that some of the information will be (in my words) fun to hear for many and dreaded by a certain sect. And now it's announced that Cipollone has been subpoenaed and agreed to testify under oath. And privilege does not apply or the crime/fraud exception.... which I've got a sneaky suspicion that Trumpty Dumpty will fall afoul of, since there is adequate evidence out there that he was told that his position was not based upon facts of the election being "stolen" from him, and apparently even Cipollone told certain parties in his echelon that their actions could basically get the book thrown at them if Trumpty Dumpty persisted in his desires. Oh, let's not forget the statements that the long-time Trumpty Dumpty faithful supporter Mick Mulvaney is now making. Isn't it rather ironic that all of these long-time faithful Republicans are coming out of the woodwork with information and changes in their position. Guess they suddenly caught the RINO disease also. The major symptom of that "disease" is when you quit worshipping the ground that Trumpty Dumpty treads on and believing all the drivel that spills from his blubbery lips. I also find it rather amusing that NOW Trumpty Dumpty is complaining because "his Republicans" have no representation on the committee. Remind me, who was it that decided to take his toys and run off all whiney when he didn't get his way? Wasn't that one of Trumpty Dumpty's boys that made that decision (most likely at the encouragement of Trumpty Dumpty thinking that if they could keep Republicans off the committee they could just do a Wizard of Oz - don't pay any attention to the man behind the curtain - to any results)? And now it's bitiing Trumpty Dumpty in the ass and he has no mouthpieces to talk through except his "MASSIVELY POPULAR" Truth Social and a few other venues, some of which are still awaiting for the executioners blade to drop on their Dominion lie lawsuits. And let's not forget the PURELY bi-partisan committee that was proposed in the Senate that had an equal number of both parties on each side, had equal ability to subpoena... but a certain party wanted to again play the Wizard of Oz routine of ignoring the man behind the curtain in the hope that if they buried their heads in the sand that it would eventually go away... guess that didn't work out like they expected, huh? Promises to be an interesting next two years. I honestly don't expect Trumpty Dumpty's 2024 desires to rise to much, especially if DeSantis decides to pursue the top slot. DeSantis is MUCH more palatable to the general Republican voter than Trumpty Dumpty currently is, although there is still a noticeable segment of Republicans that don't like DeSantis because of his "Trumpian" association.
-
The Paul "I'm gonna take ya' guns you filthy monkeys" Thread
13511 replied to 13511's topic in Master Debaters
Yes or no... it's been a lot more interesting here than it has in a long time. Boredom sets in and shit stirrers come to the fore to have fun! Although some of the fun with you Trumpsters is starting to become prophetic. Latest interviews have been REALLY eye-opening.... and now they are saying more similar to come... but that's better addressed in my special Trumpty Dumpty thread. -
The Paul "I'm gonna take ya' guns you filthy monkeys" Thread
13511 replied to 13511's topic in Master Debaters
Wasn't that the whole purpose of this site? It's so boring when everyone always agrees with each other... was time to stir up some dissension. And some of us excel in that ability. Isn't it fun being the targets of psychological warfare? :bomb: -
The Paul "I'm gonna take ya' guns you filthy monkeys" Thread
13511 replied to 13511's topic in Master Debaters
We know... the main thing you do is choke chickens. :imp: And panic about those vicious horrible guns that might suddenly mass together and attack you. -
Local drivers get an hourly wage generally... long haul drivers get paid by the mile, especially if they are independents. Even most corporate drivers get paid by the mile. There are some outside exceptions that do pay a salary or by a percentage of the load. Every OTR driver (which is 6) I know is getting paid by the mile.
-
But you want to call others liars and then get OH SO butt-hurt when you are bitch slapped with the facts... fits the profile for you well. How many miles you put on your big rig this week so far? BTW, by your statement of being union and making an "hourly wage" you reinforce that you are a simple local delivery driver.
-
blah blah blah... I'm a Trumpty Dumpty sycophant and I do my best to pursue his handling of questions, by avoiding providing any facts to back up my statements, that way I can lie to my hearts content and not have to prove anything I say.... so sayeth Sheldon the Unwise, master devotee of Trumpty Dumpty the First.
-
You call someone a liar.. .don't be surprised when you are called out and shown to be so obviously full of bull-shit that you outweigh a Christmas Turkey. Maybe it's your lack of understanding of the English language.. once more, I actively encourage you to look up that word inference. I realize it's a a complex word consisting of three syllables and may be hard for your limited understanding to grasp since you are primarily limited to single syllable words and grunts, groans and hoots to get your point across (ring a bell on what you inferred 18 year olds were for the latter 3?). You may choose to look up the word infer since it is 2 syllables and closer to your base ability. And @Paul, you are so full of shit that you put the biggest shit-faced liar to shame. At least they generally have the excuse of being intoxicated.
-
And once more, like your hero Trump, you avoid answering the question put forth to you. Please provide the "major" national chain you work for.... and elucidate on the extensive training you get. And realize, we aren't referring to a "Ace Hardware" franchise that is associated in name only. I can't claim that our local Braly's is a national chain store because it's a franchise of Ace Hardware (and Mr. Braly, the owner doesn't even do so, he acknowledges that he is an independent store).
-
Please feel free to look up the word inference. You infer someone is being untruthful, you have to expect proof of your fallibility. You don't have to specifically call for it... There's a phrase for the game you tried to play, and for the way it's refuted. Please feel free to research that and it may also further your education. That word may further your knowledge of the English language and may be something that you want to use the Jumbo Pencil and the Chief's tablet to write down for future reference. [ATTACH=full]2736._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]2737._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]2738._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]2739._xfImport[/ATTACH] Care for the bitch slapping to continue? You simply continue to prove you are a masochist.