Jump to content

A couple of 'rona questions....


Recommended Posts

Posted
W. Virginia/Virginia

 

I don't know anything about Virginia. No clue why you continually bring up that state in conversation.

 

Seems that much of the GOP mayhap attended school there then if that is so.

 

Seems you missed spelling class. (See how damn dorky your insults come off as?)

 

On another subject.... What's your position on Santos? Is he a big enough lying sack of shit that you can get fully behind him? Or are you worried that if he gets removed from office after showing what lying sacks of shits the current GOP is that he may be replaced by a Democrat?

 

Couldn't care less about Santos. He doesn't work for me.

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I don't know anything about Virginia. No clue why you continually bring up that state in conversation.

Errr... birds of a feather....

 

Seems you missed spelling class. (See how damn dorky your insults come off as?)

really.. what word did I spell incorrectly oh 6th grade graduate with a GED?

 

Couldn't care less about Santos. He doesn't work for me.

And THAT shows how stupid you are.. .yes, he DOES work for you. Just because he was elected from New York does NOT mean he still does not represent you. THAT is your ilks major issue. You have such a finite mind you can't think for the nation.. only your immediate gratification.

Posted

One more brick in the "new wall" that's being erected.

 

And at the “Stop the Steal” rally, then-President Trump eponymously exhorted his supporters to, in fact, stop the steal by marching to the Capitol. Defendant marched to the Capitol where, she testified, she understood that only Congress had the power to fix the election’s outcome and that Congress was likely in session while she was around and in the Capitol. Having followed then-President Trump’s instructions, which were in line with her stated desires, the Court therefore finds that Defendant intended her presence to be disruptive to Congressional business.

So sayeth the Federal Court.

Posted (edited)
Stange. I recall the CDC, your President, and many others tell me that taking the vaccine means it stops there. It protects you from it, you won't get it, and you cannot transmit it.

And I seem to remember TTK telling us the election was stolen... your point is?

And that Hugo Chavez and Dominion were directly involved.

 

See... that appears to be YOUR issue. You are simply a follower and cannot do factual research and then make a determination upon that research. You have to be TOLD what to think. :emoji_robot:

 

Meanwhile.. TTK and his attorneys are out yet MORE money for bullshit filings in court.

Yum... peanuts and corn... the power food of the MAGA faithful.

 

Of course, we ALL know that's simply because 77.8% of the world population has it in for TTK and are part of the deep state and are out to get him. :emoji_lollipop:

Edited by 13511
Posted
One more brick in the "new wall" that's being erected.

 

 

So sayeth the Federal Court.

 

"March to the Capitol."

 

Show me the part where Trump told them to go into the building. To break things....

Posted
"March to the Capitol."

 

Show me the part where Trump told them to go into the building. To break things....

I don't need to "show" you that... seems that the courts are determining that fact themselves.. spend a little time to educate yourself on actual ongoing factual matters and not the peanuts & corn you currently consume.

 

Remind us... who is out almost a million dollars for filing frivolous lawsuits... if you say TTK and his idiotic attorneys.. your kewpie doll is sitting over in the corner for you to pick up.

Posted
Tracy, you are going to give yourself a heart attack.

Actually not.. went in for a stress test recently and showed that I'm actually (by the results) around 40 years old. Now, tell the REST of my body that!

Posted
.....and i see you are back into your poop thing. You've been raving about that for days now.

After dealing with bullshit long enough.. everything take son the appearance of bullshit.

:poop:

 

Nobody has actually provided any FACTUAL rebuttal to any of my statements.

The general reply from the incapable here consists of

 

57Eq7Hw.jpg

 

Which corresponds to the apparent overall IQ of members here.

 

lcx3Ekdl.png

Posted
seems that the courts are determining that fact themselves

 

He had a speech you dunce. He never told them to storm the place.

 

Hahahahahahahahaahahaha. They can determine what they want, the proof is in the speech.

Posted
showed that I'm actually (by the results) around 40 years old

 

I'll need some ID verification on that Mr. Perry :eyes:. Hah. Well, at least that means you won't keel over in the middle of posting with us.

Posted

Get your peanuts and corn here, fresh hot peanuts and corn....

 

Homoerotic burn, lolllllllllllllllllllllllll. #JoelIsAGod

Donald Trump is living RENT FREE in Tracy Perry/One-Up's head
Posted (edited)
Tracy Perry, Homoerotica Author

Good money in ANY erotica author field. Seems like even back in the 80's people bought Penthouse and Playboy for their articles... and Penthouse specifically for the "letters to the editor" they had.

Or at least that's what they claimed. :p

Edited by 13511
Posted (edited)
He had a speech you dunce. He never told them to storm the place.

Seems that a court of competent jurisdiction disagrees with your opinion, oh Great Jurist.

And at the “Stop the Steal” rally, then-President Trump eponymously exhorted his supporters to, in fact, stop the steal by marching to the Capitol. Defendant marched to the Capitol where, she testified, she understood that only Congress had the power to fix the election’s outcome and that Congress was likely in session while she was around and in the Capitol. Having followed then-President Trump’s instructions, which were in line with her stated desires, the Court therefore finds that Defendant intended her presence to be disruptive to Congressional business.

 

Direct from the Judges ruling.

Doctrine shows that one doesn't have to be an active participant to be charged in a crime. Simply actively encouraging one to do something, especially knowing the mindsets (which all that has to be done is show that a reasonable person would know such), then one becomes an accomplice in the crime being committed, being complicit in an active encouragement to have someone do something. I could go into a lengthy treatise on this process... but I'm pretty sure it would be well above your ability to understand.

 

lcx3Ekdm.png

 

Just because you give the arsonist a match and tell him to go somewhere and that you will be right there with him doesn't absolve you from complicity.

Edited by 13511
Posted (edited)
LOL.

 

And the great majority are ones with the vaccine.

Really... show us the facts... not your supposition.

 

Rural Americans are dying of Covid at more than twice the rate of their urban counterparts — a divide that health experts say is likely to widen as access to medical care shrinks for a population that tends to be older, sicker, heavier, poorer and less vaccinated.

In rural northeastern Texas, Titus Regional Medical Center CEO Terry Scoggin is grappling with a 39 percent vaccination rate in his community. Eleven patients died of Covid in the first half of September at his hospital in Mount Pleasant, population 16,000. Typically, three or four nonhospice patients die there in a whole month.

Since March 2020, 1 in 434 rural Americans have died from COVID-19, compared with roughly 1 in 513 urban Americans. And unlike deaths in urban areas, the vaccine rollout has not slowed COVID-19 fatalities in rural parts of the country due to low uptake.

Despite the lower overall mortality rate among infected patients from omicron compared to earlier variants, unvaccinated people were more than twice as likely to die from COVID-19 as vaccinated patients. Researchers concluded that vaccines make a huge difference in patient outcomes despite the high number of breakthrough cases of omicron among vaccinated patients. As a result, low-vaccination parts of the country, which are mostly rural, continue to bear the highest health burden from the pandemic.

People who had received three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine or a booster were 93.4% less likely to die of the infection compared to the unvaccinated, according to a new U.K. study published on Friday.

 

Yes.. this is from 09/22... but the trend remains the same. Those unvaccinated didn't suddenly just bottom out on the stats.

 

[ATTACH=full]2788._xfImport[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH=full]2789._xfImport[/ATTACH]

 

 

https://www.azdhs.gov/covid19/documents/data/rates-of-cov-19-by-vaccination.pdf?v=20221207

Edited by 13511
Posted

Once more... I see all you have to reply with is the offal that falls out of your mouth.

Please... feel free to give us some SCIENTIFICALLY BACKED FACTS.

 

Sorry you cannot understand or accept that.

Shit son.. .you are a FINE one to be calling someone out... seems that facts are an antithesis to you and you prefer verbal diarrhea to try to make a point.

 

I'm still waiting on your factual data to back your statement up you made of

And the great majority are ones with the vaccine.
Posted
Your vaccine was worthless Tracy.

 

Sorry you cannot understand or accept that.

I think I'll take the word of world renowned medical researchers and doctors before I do yours... Sorry Sheldon... it doesn't involve 2x4's and PVC pipe.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...