Gary's New Site - Global Pandemic Virus!

[13511]

In your free time, please get me the mitigation stats with the mask and Omicron.

Mitigation of the spread of the carrier is consistent between any of the virus derivatives. It's not "variant' specific.

There are already numerous studies out there that you are free to reference to that point.

[13511]

I thought surgical masks were more for bacteria. I'll have to find out where I read that.

Any mask's primary duty is to stop the carrier of either bacteria or virus. Think about it. If you you have a bacterial infector or virus, in which case you are you more likely to spread it. When wearing a mask that blocks a large portion of the carrier material or when not not wearing a mask that allows the carrier material be freely broadcast from your mouth/nose with no intervening material in place.

People like Sheldon like to decry that it "doesn't stop all of the virus". Guess what.. it was never designed to. That's what the term mitigation refers to. It's apparently a word that is outside their lexicon.

Kinda like wearing body armor as a Police Officer. The body armor doesn't stop all the bullets you may be struck with, but it stops most of those in vital areas. You see, the cry that Sheldon uses would be the same as one used if someone was struck in the head by a round and the ballistic vest didn't "save" them.

Edited January 25, 2022 by 13511

[Sheldon]

People like Sheldon like to decry that it "doesn't stop all of the virus". Guess what.. it was never designed to. That's what the term mitigation refers to. It's apparently a word that is outside their lexicon.

 

I specifically stated IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK.

 

Not "every part of the virus" you yutz. I said masks don't fucking work. Period.

 

You amaze me Tracy, really. How, or why, do you fucking live in Texas. You are The Squad 3.0.

 

I'll state it one more time.

 

The masks don't fucking work.

 

Please, find one post where I stated anything opposite of it not fucking working, or saying part of it. I have said, many times in this thread, the masks do not fucking work. They aren't "mitigating" shit.

 

If they are, show me the stats.

[13511]

I specifically stated IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK.

 

Not "every part of the virus" you yutz. I said masks don't fucking work. Period.

 

You amaze me Tracy, really. How, or why, do you fucking live in Texas. You are The Squad 3.0.

 

I'll state it one more time.

 

The masks don't fucking work.

 

Please, find one post where I stated anything opposite of it not fucking working, or saying part of it. I have said, many times in this thread, the masks do not fucking work. They aren't "mitigating" shit.

 

If they are, show me the stats.

And I'll clearly state that (and it's supported by scientific evidence and not anecdotal stores) masks do work. Your feeble attempt to deny that they block the spread of carrier material is farcical at best.

There are numerous studies out that validate that masks mitigate the dispersion of the carrier material. Are you really sure you want me to bitch slap you with those facts? If so, I'll be more than happy to you to be the fool you appear to be, as there are tons of validated studies that prove that mask use mitigates (not prevents) the spread of COVID-19. Only the idiots think it does not.

Edited January 25, 2022 by 13511

[Sheldon]

It doesn't mitigate shit.

 

You can't possibly measure that. You're absurd.

 

And go ahead, bitch slap me. I'm sure my fear from that will subside by the time you post it.

 

Give me a fucking break.

[13511]

It doesn't mitigate shit.

 

You can't possibly measure that. You're absurd.

 

And go ahead, bitch slap me. I'm sure my fear from that will subside by the time you post it.

 

Give me a fucking break.

JAMA Network

Community mask wearing substantially reduces transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2 ways. First, masks prevent infected persons from exposing others to SARS-CoV-2 by blocking exhalation of virus-containing droplets into the air (termed source control). This aspect of mask wearing is especially important because it is estimated that at least 50% or more of transmissions are from persons who never develop symptoms or those who are in the presymptomatic phase of COVID-19 illness.1 In recent laboratory experiments, multilayer cloth masks were more effective than single-layer masks, blocking as much as 50% to 70% of exhaled small droplets and particles.2,3 In some cases, cloth masks have performed similar to surgical or procedure masks for source control. Second, masks protect uninfected wearers. Masks form a barrier to large respiratory droplets that could land on exposed mucous membranes of the eye, nose, and mouth. Masks can also partially filter out small droplets and particles from inhaled air. Multiple layers of fabric and fabrics with higher thread counts improve filtration. However, the observed effectiveness of cloth masks to protect the wearer is lower than their effectiveness for source control,3 and the filtration capacity of cloth masks can be highly dependent on design, fit, and materials used. Standards for cloth masks are needed to help consumers select marketed products.

 

Table; Supplement). At a hair salon in which all staff and clients were required to wear a mask under local ordinance and company policy, 2 symptomatic, infected stylists attended to 139 clients and no infections were observed in the 67 clients who were reached for interviewing and testing. During a COVID-19 outbreak on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, persons who wore masks experienced a 70% lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.4 Similar reductions have been reported in case contact investigations when contacts were masked5 and in household clusters in which household members were masked

PNAS

Anfinrud et al. (59) used laser light scattering to sensitively detect the emission of particles of various sizes (including aerosols) while speaking. Their analysis showed that visible particles “expelled” in a forward direction with a homemade mask consisting of a washcloth attached with two rubber bands around the head remained very close to background levels in a laser scattering chamber, while significant levels were expelled when speaking without a mask.

 

There are no studies that have directly measured the filtration of smaller or lateral particles in this setting, although, using Schlieren imaging, it has been shown that all kinds of masks greatly limit the spread of the emission cloud (79), consistent with a fluid dynamic simulation that estimated this filtration level at 90% (80). Another study used a manikin and visible smoke to simulate coughing, and found that a stitched cloth mask was the most effective of the tested designs at source control, reducing the jet distance in all directions from 8 feet (with no mask) to 2.5 inches (81).

 

One possible benefit of masks for source control is that they can reduce surface transmission, by avoiding droplets settling on surfaces that may be touched by a susceptible person. However, contact through surfaces is not believed to be the main way SARS-CoV-2 spreads (82), and the risk of transmission through surfaces may be small (83).

 

In summary, there is laboratory-based evidence that household masks have filtration capacity in the relevant particle size range, as well as efficacy in blocking aerosols and droplets from the wearer (67). That is, these masks help people keep their emissions to themselves. A consideration is that face masks with valves do not capture respiratory particles as efficiently, bypassing the filtration mechanism, and therefore offer less source control (84).

 

Mayo Clinic

Can face masks help slow the spread of the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Yes. Face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing, can help slow the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19.

 

 

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends masks for the general public. If you’re fully vaccinated and are in an area with a high number of new COVID-19 cases, the CDC recommends wearing a mask indoors in public and outdoors in crowded areas or when you are in close contact with unvaccinated people. People who haven’t been fully vaccinated should wear face masks indoors and outdoors where there is a high risk of COVID-19 transmission, such as crowded events or large gatherings.

 

The CDC says that you should wear the most protective mask possible that you'll wear regularly and that fits. Respirators such as nonsurgical N95s give the most protection. KN95s and medical masks provide the next highest level of protection. Cloth masks provide less protection. The CDC says that surgical N95 masks should be reserved for health care providers.

 

 

 

 

And I could go on, but the information is readily available. Masks mitigate the spread of the carrier material.

Edited January 26, 2022 by 13511

[Sheldon]

LooooooL.

 

They don't fucking work at stopping COVID.

 

Excellent bitch slapping.

[13511]

LooooooL.

 

They don't fucking work at stopping COVID.

 

Excellent bitch slapping.

I don't think you see me claiming that they stop covid, but that they mitigate the spread of the carrier material. Surely are are intelligent enough to know the difference between the two.

Here, just in case you don't:

mit·i·gate

/ˈmidəˌɡāt/

verb

make less severe, serious, or painful

 

stop

/stäp/

cause (an action, process, or event) to come to an end

Edited January 27, 2022 by 13511

[Sheldon]

Keep "mitigating" COVID with that little blue mask that doesn't work at stopping shit Tracy.

 

It's amazing they "mitigate" it, but yet cases keep rising no matter if you have one on or not. States currently with your "mitigating" (blue) mask mandate have a higher number of cases than those without a "mitigating" (blue) mask mandate.

 

You do you bub. Get that warm and fuzzy you need. Grasp at straws. Attempt word salad. I'll state again, they are pointless, they don't stop shit. They are 100% pointless to be wearing.

 

I almost didn't have enough in me to reply, after being bitch slapped through that impressive reply from earlier.

[13511]

I almost didn't have enough in me to reply, after being bitch slapped through that impressive reply from earlier.

And I'll continue to repeat that only the ignorant thinks that they stop anything.

We reasonably intelligent humans will continue to realize that they mitigate the spread of the carrier material.

The ignorant will continue to concentrate on that they don't "stop" it. If you want to "stop" it, wear a full set of bio gear.

[Sheldon]

LooooooooL

[Sheldon]

You wear your mask. I won't.

 

We each have the same 50% chance of catching it.

 

It doesn't stop it.

[Paul]

@Gary no one is going to join your shit shack if they can't see any content. It works for Mark because he already had members before he made his forum private.

[Sandyman]

@Gary no one is going to join your shit shack if they can't see any content. It works for Mark because he already had members before he made his forum private.

Gary had members once or twice, and then he deleted them all.

 

At one point he had a good thing running on wbb, then he got paranoid and banned everyone.

[Paul]

At one point he had a good thing running on wbb, then he got paranoid and banned everyone.

Yes, I remember that. He banned Sheldon because he sat too much on his forum board.

[Sheldon]

Ahhhh, memories.

[Sandyman]

Yes, I remember that. He banned Sheldon because he sat too much on his forum board.

If he wasn't so paranoid and kept it running without deleting everyone, he'd probably be a Big Board on TAZ/ThePedoZone.

[Paul]

I remember when Gary banned Adam Howard because Adam tried being nice to Gary by redirecting traffic from one of his closed forums to Gary’s. Gary’s cheap-ass hosting plan couldn’t handle the traffic and Gary lost his shit. It was one of the best Gary rages ever.

 

Please come back, Gary. I want to laugh again.

[SneakyDave]

We want phpbb back Gary. Please.

[13511]

For those Ivermectin fans that are so sold on it and how it prevents/cures COVID-19.

 

Efficacy of Ivermectin on Disease Progression in Patients With COVID-19

[Sheldon]

That only looked at patients with comorbidities. Which are the absolute highest risk.

 

Find research with no comorbidities and let us know the findings. I'm certain they are different.

 

You should know any data can be skewed to favor anything.

[Sheldon]

Oh wait, you thought Trumps 4 years were s failure.

 

Nevermind, you have zero common sense.

[13511]

That only looked at patients with comorbidities. Which are the absolute highest risk.

 

Find research with no comorbidities and let us know the findings. I'm certain they are different.

 

You should know any data can be skewed to favor anything.

If it's going to work, it will work with our without comorbidity if it is the "miracle drug" that so man of those that support it claim.

And that's why it's a randomized. And I see you failed to notice that it refers to other trials that revealed similar results.

López-Medina E, López P, Hurtado IC, et al. Effect of ivermectin on time to resolution of symptoms among adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

Vallejos J, Zoni R, Bangher M, et al. Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):635

Of course, we all know it's a MAJOR CONSPIRACY by Big Pharma to make tons of money and co-ordinate with the government to program the people with nanobots and to genetically mutate them into New Humans and to give them a "magnetic" personality.

 

 

Oh wait, you thought Trumps 4 years were s failure.

And no, good things were done during his administration, but they weren't developed by him, but by those "deep state" people behind him... or at least those that weren't in his 96% A-team turnover rated of people.

Trump himself is a failure. Seems that those Trump cult members can't grasp the difference.

Now, care to expound on Shred-Gate, Dump-Gate and his sneaking top secret papers off to Mar-a-Largo? Or how about the fact that his attempt to keep from having to testify under oath about his NY Trump Org shenanigans was shot down and now he has to try to rely on an appeal (his normal routine of trying to shirk responsibility)?

Or how about that judge refusing to quash the civil suits filed against him as a result of his speech on 01/06/2021?

Or how about the fact that roughly 49% of Republicans polled have NO desire to see him run for President in 2024, up from 30% just a few months ago?

Things are looking bleaker and bleaker for him. Poor little abused Trumpty Dumpty.

Edited February 20, 2022 by 13511

[Sheldon]

[ATTACH=full]2709._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[Paul]

The queen of England has covid and no one can see any comments dumdum makes about it on his shit shack.