What did the baboon say?

[Sandyman]

God doesn't like Trump either. I wonder if God's going to wipe Mar-a-Lago clean. The lunatic Trump always bitched about Obama playing golf while doing it himself and even worst.

worst? lol.

[Sandyman]

Mucho Taco is about the only Spanish I know.

Where's @fixer when you need him...he's fluent.

[Kent.S]

worst? lol.

 

Yeah, he is the mostest worstest one ever!

[Sheldon]

[ATTACH=full]1549._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[Kent.S]

[ATTACH=full]1762[/ATTACH]

 

That is awesome!

[fool]

I was browsing comments on DISQUS just a few minutes ago and stumbled upon this image;

 

http://i.imgur.com/gW5xrmc.jpg

 

LMAO! Is that also the reason why Bash knows about dumdum, senator Taichi Master and Mr. V more than anyone else?

[SneakyDave]

Is that post even on topic chickenscratches? They are getting harder and harder to decipher.

[Sheldon]

Is that also the reason why Bash knows about dumdum, senator Taichi Master and Mr. V more than anyone else?

 

What on earth did any of that have to do with this thread? Why not post in one of the others, actually dealing with one of the three?

[Kent.S]

Is that post even on topic chickenscratches? They are getting harder and harder to decipher.

What on earth did any of that have to do with this thread? Why not post in one of the others, actually dealing with one of the three?

 

Simple, because it is, Mr.Tool/Mr.Vice/Mr.Chickenscratches/Mr.バイス, he must post off topic crap like our favorite dumdum does.

[fool]

What? I never complaint people talking about other shits on my baboon thread. Why can't I do the same?

[fool]

Speaking of that baboon, why does all sock accounts behave the same? He's even using my TAZ avatar.

[Sheldon]

What? I never complaint people talking about other shits on my baboon thread. Why can't I do the same?

 

You can, just seems as though it would serve a better purpose in the other threads.

 

As for the baboon thread, I think my "Trump kicking everyone's ass and taking names" gif shut that shit down.

[fool]

Kinda think about it, what does that thread has to do with Trump? The lunatic's an orangutan, not a baboon.

[Kent.S]

[ATTACH=full]1556._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[Kent.S]

Amazing how fast a positive thread can be turned into total crap by the ramblings of one idiotic lunatic.

[Sheldon]

Kinda think about it, what does that thread has to do with Trump? The lunatic's an orangutan, not a baboon.

 

It was in reply to this:

 

God doesn't like Trump either. I wonder if God's going to wipe Mar-a-Lago clean. The lunatic Trump always bitched about Obama playing golf while doing it himself and even worst.

 

Which you brought into the thread first.

[fool]

Which was a reply to Jelly's comment and on and on. Point is, I behave exactly as everyone else, like uncivilized lunatic forumers. If anyone has issue with me, then they should look at themselves first.

[Sheldon]

Which was a reply to Jelly's comment and on and on. Point is, I behave exactly as everyone else, like uncivilized lunatic forumers. If anyone has issue with me, then they should look at themselves first.

 

Oh, he brought up Trump.... typical. Someone else's fault.

 

I didn't see that.

[Kent.S]

[ATTACH=full]1557._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[fool]

That thread is for exposing a sock account, not about lunacy. Everyone here are lunatics.

[fool]

Speaking of lunatics;

 

[13511]

Speaking of lunatics;

Saw another one there also.. seemed to be using a can and had the contents that were being expelled ignited in a home made flame thrower. Where's the outrage for him threatening people with a weapon of mass destruction? :scream:

 

I know this much... if I'm armed and someone comes at me with something like that they will be told once to back off... next thing they'll observe is the impact of the rounds hitting their actual body and not the ground.

[Kent.S]

Saw another one there also.. seemed to be using a can and had the contents that were being expelled ignited in a home made flame thrower. Where's the outrage for him threatening people with a weapon of mass destruction? :scream:

 

I know this much... if I'm armed and someone comes at me with something like that they will be told once to back off... next thing they'll observe is the impact of the rounds hitting their actual body and not the ground.

 

Sounds to me like Vice needs to fill out one of these forms and file it through the proper channels.

 

[ATTACH=full]1561._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[fool]

[uSER=21]@Popo Nazi[/uSER]

 

 

If you're not so much of a nazi, you'll see that during the video no one was in imminent danger. In fact, you can see the guy with the white cap walking casually in front of the flaming canister guy. You can argue that the flaming canister can be harmful to other protesters but not once during the whole length of the video did anything justify shooting a gun. The gunner himself was in no imminent danger nor was anyone else there. Shooting a gun like that is attempted murder. But hell, a white supremacy lunatic like you could not care less about humanity apart from your own race.

[13511]

The gunner himself was in no imminent danger nor was anyone else there. Shooting a gun like that is attempted murder. But hell, a white supremacy lunatic like you could not care less about humanity apart from your own race.

Couple of things here...

#1 - in Texas (at least) you can use deadly force to protect a 3rd party, so personal threat is not required. There is also no requirement to "run away".

#2 - you don't see what the flamethrower idiot was doing prior to the discharge of the firearm so you can't say as a fact that he was not threatening a 3rd party, you are just ASSuming that as fact.

#3 - As I stated, if someone threatened ME with a flamethrower, they'd get some smaller objects thrown back at them and it would be justified - nowhere did I comment in that aspect on the video (again, I know following the written word presents difficulties for you compared to pictures) and whether he was justified or not. His political beliefs does not mean that he does not have to follow the same requirements as others - including the one that may allow protection of 3rd parties. Just because you don't agree with his political outlook does not mean that the law (and it's exemptions) does not apply to him. I realize you would most likely prefer different sets of laws for different "classes"...

 

And we bring you to the most vital point of all

#4 - could you not have posted this reply in the same thread that the discussion was occurring in? For your ease of referral since you apparently have such difficulty I hyperlinked to it.