Search the Community

Assuming Trump and Clinton will be the presidential nominees this summer, the media and their opponents will be focusing on these big items in their attacks. For Trump, it'll be his reluctance to disclose his tax returns. Currently, he claims to be under an audit, and won't release them. But I think if he gets the Republican nomination, there will be a larger focus on this issue, and more attacks that he isn't as rich as he claims to be. If Trump does win the nomination, can he afford to keep paying for his campaign himself? I don't think so. He's going to have to ask for money sometime in the near future. For Clinton, the email scandal should be the biggest tactic to use against her, but there hasn't been much talk about it lately. It'll depend on the FBI, or other ongoing investigations, to make or break Clinton's support for the presidency. I think she's got more to lose than Trump in this regard, but she's been dodging scandals like this for quite a while.

The Sandbag = Reince Priebus Regardless of what anyone wants, thinks he is in control and has final say. SneakyDave = Alex Jones Exposes all frauds. Many are not fans of his. Chicken Thingies = Bernie Sanders Many ideas, many changes. Stands firm on choices. Paul = Marco Rubio Just wants to fit in. A "yes sir" follower. GTB = Jeb Bush Old, crusty, boring. Low energy. #11 = Donald Trump Doesn't give a shit about what anyone wants or thinks. Morganna = Hillary Clinton Lying bitch. Been at it for too long, many people are fooled. Pack it in hag. Adam Howard = Lyin' Rafael Cruz Self explanatory. Thoughts? Changes? Rebuttals?

Does it really matter what groups endorse which candidates? I've never really understood why it's advantageous to have certain newspapers (NEWSPAPERS!) endores your campaign. What value does it provide? Have you ever voted for somebody based on who endorsed them?

Can Uncle Bernie pull out the upset?