Sheldon

The difference, he wants to go, but he has stated its not possible to do so "now". He can want forever. Doesn't change anything since he cannot get there.

Lol. Pat yourself on the back. That's hilarious. A guy who literally works for NASA, who is an astronaut, says the technology has been destroyed and we cannot go to the moon. And you are right and he's not? Tell me, how many space missions were you a part of again?

Uhhh, then let them register? Not that I give a shit for myself either way. I'll post what I choose regardless of it's shown or not. I do respect others choices though. Surprising you are on the stance you are.

So you say.... But a NASA astronaut says it isn't. So, who is right?

Mars.... hahahhahhahhaah. We cannot even make it "back" to the moon, yet we are going to discuss getting to Mars? That's laughable.

Why in the hell would the US destroy the technology that allowed us to get to the moon? That makes absolutely zero sense.

Exactly, so why can we not go back now?

Claims he'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, but can't, because we've "destroyed" that technology. He must be talking about Kubrick's technology then.

I'm just going off what one of the astronauts say.

The technology to get to the moon.

Quick question... if we gained all this supposed technology, why in the world would we destroy it?

[ATTACH=full]1699._xfImport[/ATTACH]

This. So fucking strange.

Appreciate the diagnosis.

...and what should I be going to the doctor for? I don't think you've ever mentioned my "illness".

Restructured trade deals. In the end, they will have paid for it.

The wall will be built. Mexico, yes, will be paying for it.

[ATTACH=full]1658._xfImport[/ATTACH]

They are tied in, not "floating" as if in space. They have edited out all other wires, but missed those when he pulled the guy back. Pretty sure that Tweet is implying they are not in "outer space. We definitely knows it's not the moon, as NASA has claimed the technology used to get there the first time has been destroyed.... lol.

"Rattling your cage bars? WTF... hahahahah

[ATTACH=full]1647._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1648._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1649._xfImport[/ATTACH]

https://twitter.com/username/status/859057254623879168 View: https://twitter.com/WeAreWakinUp/status/859057254623879168

Just ran across this Dave, quoting Ben Roethlisberger: "I was unable to sleep last night and want to share my thoughts and feelings on our team’s decision to remain in the tunnel for the National Anthem yesterday. The idea was to be unified as a team when so much attention is paid to things dividing our country, but I wish we approached it differently. We did not want to appear divided on the sideline with some standing and some kneeling or sitting. As a team, it was not a protest of the flag or the Anthem. I personally don’t believe the Anthem is ever the time to make any type of protest. For me, and many others on my team and around the league, it is a tribute to those who commit to serve and protect our country, current and past, especially the ones that made the ultimate sacrifice. I appreciate the unique diversity in my team and throughout the league and completely support the call for social change and the pursuit of true equality. Moving forward, I hope standing for the Anthem shows solidarity as a nation, that we stand united in respect for the people on the front lines protecting our freedom and keeping us safe. God bless those men and women."

I defend and protect a cut on my finger with neosporin and a bandaid. So, that's implying those two are heroic? You can only assume. You cannot possibly predict the future.

So, again, where did I say anything about "hero"? I said we have fought everywhere... I said we've fought, defended and protected. I never once said that was heroic. Now, as far as the freedom of speech, let's just assume Nazi Germany wins the war. You think we'd have free speech now?