Jump to content

Sheldon

Members
  • Posts

    1,412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Everything posted by Sheldon

  1. Sue, they can exist. They are there. Just further out than the sun is in most cases. It's not a hard concept to understand. I understand it's not what everyone had been taught and taught and taught. I get that. It's hard to approach this with an open mind, because of how "laughable" you've been taught it is. No worries. What? You've confused me. With the earth flat, yes. It would be. And the North Pole is the center, of the center.
  2. Correct, he was proven guilty. I think the trial was a farce, but doesn't changed the outcome. The next trial will clear him, easily.
  3. There have been plenty of millionaires convicted of murder Paul... They had plenty of money.
  4. He's a murderer? If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. He was proven innocent as I recall it...
  5. I won't be holding my breath on us going back to the moon. We haven't went and we can't get there. I'll hold my stance.
  6. Deal with it.... [ATTACH=full]1717._xfImport[/ATTACH]
  7. Right now they are saying it's impossible for us to pass through it.... but we did back in the day, "supposedly".
  8. "We"? Don't include me in this. His site, he pays the bills, in the end, its his rules. I'll post as I normally do, if it's wrong, so be it. I'm sure he'll let me know when it is. Other than that, I don't have any issues with any decisions made here. I just enjoy the conversation.
  9. Tedious work.
  10. Again, show me where I said such. You can't. Simply typing it doesn't mean I stated as much. And I've already replied to your polls. Unless EVERY single person had been asked, those polls are worthless. We've already seen that time and again.
  11. Can't get to the moon, yet still talking about hitting Mars...
  12. NASA never designed one, because they don't do enough to make reusability worthwhile. Scan my posts, note where I've stated that, or assumed that. What I did state was how he could possibly afford to do it, yet NASA ( which has considerably more $ and manpower) cannot. And I do mean go to the moon, not make multiple missions.
  13. Wait, NASA can't get there on their budget, but you want me to believe Musk has the money to do it? Hahhahhahahahahahahahah.
  14. $52mil a day isn't enough budget? Laughable. Desire? Per who? And don't give me any sample poll. Unless that Q is asked of every single person, you cannot possibly answer that. Need proof of that, look at the sample polls picking Crooked Hillary to win (ALL of them). It's simple. You don't create something, get somewhere, destroy it, then pray you can make it again (which obviously hasn't been done yet). Amusing.
  15. Pinterest? Lol
  16. You've solved this all yourself. Private to members only, right? Let them register to read. It's a bonus for joining our little circus.
  17. Are you seriously that dense. Who in the hell ever said to keep it "as is"? Common sense as well as current reality says you upgrade it. Not trash it. Improved the shit out of it apparently. So much so, we currently cannot possibly make it back.
  18. [ATTACH=full]1708._xfImport[/ATTACH]
  19. Tracy, you are as bad as Gary going back and editing your posts and adding full paragraphs in. I get an error or two, but a full paragraph after I've replied twice. Impossible to follow along, just add another comment.
  20. I quoted your "improved tech" that we are working on. And as said 10000 times, it cannot get us back. [ATTACH=full]1707._xfImport[/ATTACH]
  21. Yeah, maintain it. Not improve it or build on it.... Makes sense. Oh wait, screw it, let's just trash it all, never go back, and hit Mars instead. Yeah, much more logical.
  22. I'm the exception to ganging up on Gary, right? I'm trying to follow along here. U.mmm, I don't hold back on anything or anyone I disagree with. I don't think I circle jerk others... Or, am I missing something here?
  23. Which currently cannot get us back to the moon. As I've stated.
  24. I asked this: Nothing smartass, just asked the question since you stated you know more about the current Space Program than a NASA astronaut. By your reply, I'll assume zero.
  25. Obviously he's not stating to use the 60's tech. Don't be obtuse. We all know technology can be made better. He's on record saying that its been destroyed, and it's too painful to build back... so currently we DON'T EVEN HAVE THE ABILITY to get back there (emphasis added by me). Yet, people want to talk about Mars, and "touring " the moon... hahahhahahahah. Of course you did. I knew that before this thread started.
×
×
  • Create New...