Jump to content

fool

Members
  • Posts

    863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by fool

  1. Lets not forget, these killers killed children. Tamir Rice still hasn't receive his justice till this day. And paid by big corporations to beat native Americans.
  2. Statement with no supporting evidence from the video you linked to. That is a supposition held by you. No third party was in imminent danger. If there is any, show me the evidence, otherwise there is none. I cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof is on your side. If, prior to the discharge he had ran up on someone "spraying" the flame towards them then the action would be totally justified. Absolutely not. From the video it's clear that the flame doesn't endanger anyone because of the sufficient distance. No imminent threat was presence. You point a fucking flaming can of anything at me in close proximity and I'll shoot your fucking ass until your action ceases. No one does and that makes you a murderer. The popo are well known killers, thugs with small penises and guns paid by the tax payers. At least other thugs use their own money.
  3. #1 - in Texas (at least) you can use deadly force to protect a 3rd party, so personal threat is not required. There is also no requirement to "run away". No third party was in danger when the gun was unload. #2 - you don't see what the flamethrower idiot was doing prior to the discharge of the firearm so you can't say as a fact that he was not threatening a 3rd party, you are just ASSuming that as fact. Irrelevant. What the flamethrower did prior is tied to the previous context, not with the context where the gun was shot in which instance nobody was in danger. Your logic is typical of popo excuse used to kill people all the time. #3 - As I stated, if someone threatened ME with a flamethrower, they'd get some smaller objects thrown back at them and it would be justified No object was thrown at the shooter nor anyone else immediately before the lunatic shot his gun.
  4. [uSER=21]@popo delusional[/uSER] i'm sure your path was the one jimmy page took
  5. that chick is too young for your age logic still, good luck with your banjo
  6. Yeah, you haven't answer my question. Whose path are you following?
  7. Who? People picked up instruments when they see others play. They will try to mimic their friends and once they're sufficiently in love with the guitar, only then they'll venture into theory. I used to draw better than this when I was young. [ATTACH=full]1564._xfImport[/ATTACH]
  8. You're going the wrong way. You're suppose to enjoy the instrument. Theories come later after you're able to play some basic things. At you're age, you're not suppose to get a degree in music. But maybe that's what you're up to and not really enjoying the guitar.
  9. Stop thinking like a lunatic. You're just started playing, you should concentrate on the basic first. Simple chords, consistent strum.
  10. [uSER=21]@popo guitar[/uSER] Try playing this one. Chords and strumming are simple. This song makes me wanna draw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_UZ_4SoEuE View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_UZ_4SoEuE
  11. [uSER=21]@Popo Nazi[/uSER] If you're not so much of a nazi, you'll see that during the video no one was in imminent danger. In fact, you can see the guy with the white cap walking casually in front of the flaming canister guy. You can argue that the flaming canister can be harmful to other protesters but not once during the whole length of the video did anything justify shooting a gun. The gunner himself was in no imminent danger nor was anyone else there. Shooting a gun like that is attempted murder. But hell, a white supremacy lunatic like you could not care less about humanity apart from your own race.
  12. Speaking of lunatics;
  13. That thread is for exposing a sock account, not about lunacy. Everyone here are lunatics.
  14. Why is my posts moved?
  15. Which was a reply to Jelly's comment and on and on. Point is, I behave exactly as everyone else, like uncivilized lunatic forumers. If anyone has issue with me, then they should look at themselves first.
  16. Kinda think about it, what does that thread has to do with Trump? The lunatic's an orangutan, not a baboon.
  17. Speaking of that baboon, why does all sock accounts behave the same? He's even using my TAZ avatar.
  18. What? I never complaint people talking about other shits on my baboon thread. Why can't I do the same?
  19. I was browsing comments on DISQUS just a few minutes ago and stumbled upon this image; http://i.imgur.com/gW5xrmc.jpg LMAO! Is that also the reason why Bash knows about dumdum, senator Taichi Master and Mr. V more than anyone else?
  20. Aku no Hana is the exact opposite of Koe no Katachi. It's a tale of caution of how an ordinary elementary boy can become so twisted after he was introduced to a paranoid schizophrenic female classmate.
  21. God doesn't like Trump either. I wonder if God's going to wipe Mar-a-Lago clean. The lunatic Trump always bitched about Obama playing golf while doing it himself and even worst.
  22. In another words, TAZ staff can trace this baboon if they want to since he linked the TAZ thread here while logged in and you can use the timestamp of his post here to narrow it down.
  23. Lol, this baboon is an active user on TAZ. I'm pretty sure I know which baboon it is.
  24. Can't you do that from CentOS log? You can see the IPs log for access to certain database sections at specific timestamps?
  25. Does Xenforo has a log for which users was viewing a specific thread at a certain timestamp? Or can we trace that in CentOS?
×
×
  • Create New...