13511

Again, context... IF that individual felt in imminent fear, then yes... see..... that's the part of the law YOU apparently have difficulty understanding. It doesn't matter what YOU think is appropriate... it matters what HE thought at that time (or a 3rd party coming to the defense of another). As I said, let's watch.... can almost guarantee you that the shooter will use a defense of 3rd party argument and will get off. Actually the dumb-ass with the ignited can should have been taken to jail also. I'll let you ruminate on this

Let's see... what can flame do to you.. it can catch your happy ass on fire... and being caught on fire can result in serious bodily injury or death... so proportionally using a firearm to plant lead can result in the same results - serious bodily injury or death... Looks equivalent to me. Or are you trying to imply that people are impervious to flames and being burned? The fact is, the idiot was trying to use force to intimidate people.. and not everyone WILL be intimidated and they are NOT required to back down to idiots.

He's not even required to do that.

And lack of ability to understand sarcasm perfectly defines the mindset of a left wing la-la land daydream believer.

Yes, he leans backwards (the still shot clearly shows that, then uses the flag to try to force the aggressor away. And he has no incumbency on him to retreat.

That's right... the strong shall rule! The weak will be everyone's bitches.

You apparently did not pay attention to the two screenshot excerpts that were in the thread linked. Here, let me give them to you again Looks like he's pulling backwards to me. Looks like he's taking an action with the flag to force the idiot with the flame thrower back to me. And you DO realize that most states (at least ones that believe in self defense) do not require you to retreat, correct? Is There a Duty to Retreat Under Virginia Criminal Law?

And it looks like their internal investigation agrees... this "officer" and the LT involved violated many rules of the department. Like I said, they need to be terminated, and criminal charges brought where appropriate. Investigators blast Salt Lake City police officers for violent arrest of nurse Internal affairs investigation finds police officers who arrested nurse violated a number of department policies

Solves the issue and actually will answer the question on which belief has more "bad-asses" in it.

Which does not imply guilt. It only means that charges were filed. Face it, AntiFA is no better than the extreme right you protest against so much. Both simply need to be led out to a large auditorium, given blades and told the last man standing gets to walk free... then shoot the one left standing.

You and I apparently are looking at 2 different videos... I clearly saw the guy with a flag swinging to force the flame thrower guy backwards (in fact, I'm pretty sure I included a photo with a highlight of said indvidiual... and a reasonable person would believe that he felt threatened. Here, let me refer you back to said post - What did the baboon say?.

Winner! Those lips and lazy eyes probably gave it away.

What is my stage name? [ATTACH=full]1599._xfImport[/ATTACH]

no need to apologize... I just thought it might have been an epic bender going on.

OK, nothing new to see... SOSDD.

OK.. now you got my curiosity up... time to go visit.

But...but...but... if you read it on the interwebz in the newsgroupz it's GOT to be true.

Because I told you what I would do if I was faced with that situation.... and I do happen to live in Texas. If you review backwards, I clearly state that I don't know what the law is in the state in question. And pretty sure that this section here of your post will get him off. Being burned with an item that is ejecting a flame presents a danger of great bodily injury. Oh, and from that page I bring your attention to Which means it is assessed from the view of the actor (the person using the deadly force), not from the view of an arm chair quarterback. And I further bring your attention to So, Mr Flamethrower is clearly the aggressor. Oh, and I'll leave you with this thought from that page also - courtesy of McGhee v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 560 <emphasis added by me> So, thank you for affirming the fact that the individual in question will most likely use a self defense of 3rd party claim and will be very likely to get off on it under Virginia state law. Oh, and you better play close attention to 1.2 also on that page I do think (and most reasonable persons would) that waving a flame ejecting item at someone and then taking a step/leaning towards them with it would be a menacing present peril and the very act has the ability (presents an imminent danger) of being burned by that individual (and said burns presenting a high possibility of SBI or even death) and most persons would also agree you must be unstable to be doing threaten someone with a ignited can of flaming material and unstable persons actions are usually not predictable. But, now I move onward to more important things like seeing if the new iPhone can be ordered on Verizon. Gotta keep those Chinese workers earning their yen.

Well, I'd have a LOT more sympathy if I saw 'em toting loaves of bread and similar foodstuffs.

Yep, and there was another one that was burglarizing a business.... but there's a definite difference between burglary and looting (which the first video shows)... yes, the offense is burglary in whatever case, but there is a difference between those that do it in a sneaky manner (your typical burglar) and those that are doing like in the video in the OP. .........but that's not what I found interesting that video.

Let's see how long it takes a certain someone to chime in about the right being racist blah blah blah.

Actually nobody could log in during that period. I also had the same error for a while... I guess over there in the asiatic area where [uSER=4]@Crazy For Coco Puffs[/uSER] lives time flows backwards and he is regressing in age if his recent posts are any indication.

Well, we can only hope one day he can read and comprehend the english language and not need pictographs, pictures or video to understand.

Any argument.... when parties are in disagreement on items/stances/beliefs and are discoursing on it, it is frequently referred to as arguing a point or points. [ATTACH=full]1592._xfImport[/ATTACH]